MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF LOVE PERMUTATION & COMBINATION OF
RED LOVE β€ - GREEN LOVE π - VIOLET LOVE π
Everything starts and ends with SELF, naturally. Unless it is self-directed, it is not naturally justified. The sense of SELF at any moment is defined as the SENSE OF GROWTH one attains at that specific moment. The growth happens in two ways, physically and cognitively. Physical growth is finite and the cognitive growth is infinite. Physical growth means the growth of physical existence and its connections. Cognitive growth means the growth or expansion of cognitive capabilities.
A: Permutations & Combination of all three types of LOVE:
1. GREEN LOVE π + RED LOVE β€ + VIOLET LOVE π
2. GREEN LOVE π + VIOLET LOVE π + RED LOVE β€
3. RED LOVE β€ + GREEN LOVE π + VIOLET LOVE π
4. RED LOVE β€ + VIOLET LOVE π + GREEN LOVE π
5. VIOLET LOVE π+ GREEN LOVE π + RED LOVE β€
6. VIOLET LOVE π+ RED LOVE β€ + GREEN LOVE π
B: Permutations & Combination of two out of three types of LOVE:
1. GREEN LOVE π + RED LOVE β€
2. RED LOVE β€ + GREEN LOVE π
3. GREEN LOVE π + VIOLET LOVE π
4. VIOLET LOVE π+ GREEN LOVE π
5. RED LOVE β€ + VIOLET LOVE π
6. VIOLET LOVE π+ RED LOVE β€
C: Permutations & Combination of one out of three types of LOVE:
1. GREEN LOVE π
2. RED LOVE β€
3. VIOLET LOVE π
INTERPRETATIONS OF PERMUTATION & COMBINATIONS
ALL LOVE TOGETHER IN DIFFERENT ORDERS
CATEGORY A
A.1. π + β€ + π
When we are in a state of acceptance first and then get attracted to the physical traits of someone, then we get attracted to some or other cognitive trait(s) in that person, it falls in this category.
Example:
A person maintaining the neutral state of mind in accepting everyoneβs RIGHTS TO EXIST then starts liking someoneβs physical attribution(s), then starts identifying and liking some or other cognitive aptitude(s) of that person, too.
A.2. π + π + β€
When we are in a state of acceptance first and then get attracted to the cognitive trait(s) of someone, then we get attracted to some or other physical trait(s) in that person, it falls in this category.
Example:
A person maintaining the neutral state of mind in accepting everyoneβs RIGHT TO EXISTS then starts liking someoneβs some or other cognitive aptitude(s), finally starts identifying and liking physical attribution(s) of that person, too!
A. 3. β€ + π + π
When we start liking some or other physical attribution(s) of a person to start a relationship then we accept the whole existence of the person and her/his RIGHTS TO EXIST, later on, we identify and start liking some or other cognitive attribution(s) as well.
Example:
We love the look of someone and then accept her/him will all other identified flaws in the person. Ultimately identify the likeable cognitive aptitude of that person, too! In other words, Loving someone at the physical level, at the beginning then accepting the whole then identifies relatable cognitive traits in that person as well.
A. 4. β€ + π + π
When we start liking some or other physical attribution(s) of a person to start a relationship then we identify and start liking some or other cognitive attribution(s) of the person then gradually accept the whole existence of the person and her/his RIGHTS TO EXIST, as well.
Example:
Loving someone at the physical level, in the beginning, then loving some or other relatable cognitive traits in that person as well. Then finally, accepting her/him as s/he is.
A. 5. π + π + β€
When we start loving some or other cognitive trait(s) of a person then accept the RIGHTS TO EXIST as a whole individual, finally end up loving the physical trait of that person too.
Example:
Loving an artist to start with, then loving her/him as a whole with all the identified flaws and qualities, finally loving her/his physical attributes also.
A. 6. π + β€ + π
When we start loving some or other cognitive trait(s) of a person then start loving her/his physical trait(s) and finally accept the RIGHTS TO EXIST as a whole individual, too.
Example:
Loving an entrepreneur to start with, then loving her/him physical attributes and then loving him/her as a whole with all the identified flaws and qualities.
B. 1. π + β€
When there is a lack in identifying any relatable cognitive trait(s) yet we accept the individualβs RIGHTS TO EXIST and then love her/his physical trait(s).
Example:
With an attitude of acceptance when you start loving physical attribution of an individual, especially.
B. 2. β€ + π
When there is a lack in identifying any relatable cognitive trait(s) yet we are attracted towards the physical attribution/connection in the first place. Then we also accept the individualβs RIGHTS TO EXIST.
Example:
All blood relations start with identifying the physical connections in the first place. Then end up accepting the relative even if there are no likeable cognitive traits available in the person.
B. 3. π + π
When we identify no physical attraction or connection in a person yet we accept the individualβs RIGHTS TO EXIST and then we start sensing the attraction towards her/his cognitive trait(s).
Example:
With an attitude of acceptance when you start loving cognitive attribution of an individual, especially
B. 4. π + π
When we identify no physical attraction or connection in a person yet we start sensing attraction due to her/his cognitive capabilities and then we start accepting the individualβs RIGHTS TO EXIST as a whole with all the flaws and merits together.
Example:
When we become a fan of an artist in the first place and then knowing her/his identified demerits also we accept the person as a whole without any aversions. But we sense no physical attraction towards that person.
B. 5. β€ + π
When we do not accept the person wholly yet we feel attracted physically and towards some of the cognitive traits of the person.
Example:
When we feel attracted by the looks of an individual in the first instance and then identify a few cognitive traits as well but cannot tolerate the person as a whole with all merits and demerits of that personality.
B. 6. π + β€
When we do not accept the person wholly yet we feel attracted towards some of the cognitive traits of the person in the first place then we start feeling some attraction towards the physical attributes of the person, as well.
Example:
Starting with identifying someoneβs talking style as attractive and after that finding her/him physically attractive too. But cannot tolerate the person as a whole with all merits and demerits of that personality.
C.1. π
This is a state of ACCEPTANCE of every sort of merits or demerits of people equally. Perceivably, there is denial to the exclusive ASSOCIATIONS, both, physically or cognitively. But at the core, the individual merges consciously with the universal INACTIONS, where the physical love and cognitive love are not denied but not given any extra importance to any.
Example:
This is a rare state! This may come and go in the arena of execution for an individual. Sustenance of this state is the highest state of conserved vitality. This is a homeostatic spiritual level where the individual enjoys the state of ultimate equanimity.
C.2. β€
This is a state of obsessive focus on Physical attraction or connection. In this state, the requirement of neutral love or the state of ACCEPTANCE is denied completely and also the expansion of cognition in cognitive love is neglected.
Example:
A parent loves her/his child blindly being irrational about identifying the childβs merits and demerits of the characteristics, the individual is in denial of the ACCEPTANCE of TRUTH.
A sex-maniac is also in a state of only RED LOVE with the denial of the needed experience of GREEN & VIOLET loves.
C.3. π
This a state of obsession about some specific cognitive traits of the βlovedβ individual. It is a state of denial of the fact that cognitive traits are dynamic and change with time. Unless the individual is in the state of ACCEPTANCE along with the knack of identifying the traits whenever confronted, the individual would suffer the irrational engagement of vitality in the area of seeking cognitive associations.
Example:
Love towards a singer till s/he sings well.
Love towards a cricket-player till s/he plays well.